Why India’s Urban Future Must Be Vertical — Not Horizontal

India’s most dynamic housing transformation may not come from glitzy new suburbs or special economic zones—it’s emerging from something far more grounded: the redevelopment of ageing housing colonies.

The current Maharashtra government is auctioning off large-scale redevelopment contracts worth hundreds, even thousands of crores, especially in Mumbai. Developers have been tasked with rebuilding old, often structurally unsound housing societies. What’s unique about this model is that these aren’t just replacement projects; developers are incentivised to add hundreds of new saleable homes in these vertical complexes.


Redevelopment as a Supply-Side Solution

From a market perspective, the logic is compelling:

  • Developers are incentivised to pay premium bids because they’re allowed to build and sell additional units alongside the obligatory rehab component.
  • The projects are located in already high-demand zones—Dadar, Bandra, Andheri, Chembur—where land is expensive and scarce.
  • This model adds to urban housing supply without acquiring new land, and without the ecological or political complications of greenfield expansion.

The long-term outcome? A price stabilisation effect, as more inventory becomes available in high-value locations—benefiting both homebuyers and the broader market.

But there’s something more profound at play here. Redevelopment through vertical expansion may well be India’s most ecologically and sociologically sound path forward. It’s not just a market fix—it’s a model for reclaiming livability in our ageing, overcrowded cities.


The Vertical Advantage

Land is finite. In old industrial cities like Mumbai, Kolkata, and Bengaluru, the option of outward expansion comes at a severe cost: deforestation, flooding, and unsustainable commute patterns. Horizontal urbanisation devours farmland, wetlands, and hills. It’s a losing proposition in an era of rising temperatures and shrinking water tables.

Vertical redevelopment, by contrast, is land-smart. By building higher, it concentrates human habitation into tighter footprints, freeing up precious land for:

  • Open spaces like parks, walkways, and plazas
  • Urban forests and biodiversity zones
  • Water bodies that recharge aquifers and regulate climate
  • Community areas that encourage social interaction

In effect, vertical cities can do what urban India forgot: breathe.


Redevelopment as a Force for Good

When done right, this model ticks every box of equitable urbanism:

  • Supply-side boost: More homes in high-demand areas, easing price pressure.
  • Dignified housing: Upgraded, safer, and often larger flats for old residents.
  • Infrastructure reset: New plumbing, electricity, and sewage systems in areas that badly need them.
  • Efficient governance: Clustered populations are easier to serve with transit, education, and healthcare.

It’s also deeply sustainable. Higher population densities allow for shorter utility networks, shared solar rooftops, waste segregation, and even greywater recycling.


Pitfalls to Avoid

Of course, vertical growth is not a magic bullet. Poorly executed redevelopment can worsen urban inequality and stress city services. We must guard against:

  • Litigation delays by disparate stakeholders that keep entire societies in limbo
  • Inadequate rental support for displaced residents during construction
  • Gentrification that prices out original communities
  • Overburdened water and power systems if public infrastructure aren’t upgraded in sync 

That said, these are challenges of planning and governance—not of the vertical model itself.


A Model for India’s Urban Future

This push for redevelopment shouldn't just be a Mumbai story. It can be a blueprint for Delhi’s ageing DDA flats, Bengaluru’s HAL quarters, or Chennai’s old LIC and CPWD blocks. India’s older cities are filled with public housing built in the 1960s–80s, most of it now dilapidated, low-rise, and are inefficiently using prime urban land.

Instead of expanding our old industrial cities endlessly, it’s time to reimagine what is already built—by going upwards, with empathy and ecological foresight.


Conclusion: Let's Reclaim India's Urban Life—from the Ground Up

India’s first phase of urbanisation was land-hungry. The next must be land-smart. Vertical redevelopment offers the rare possibility of solving housing shortages while giving cities back their social and natural commons.

In other words, by building higher, we make room below—for trees, parks, lakes, and people. In the long run, vertical cities may be the only way for India’s urban life to rise—in every sense of the word.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Bored" or Rewriting the Playbook? A Rebuttal to the West’s Sneering Gaze at India’s Legacy Billionaire Gen Z

Bloomberg's Andy Mukherjee’s latest opinion piece — sniggering at India’s legacy billionaire Gen Z for supposedly being “bored” of their family businesses — is hardly an outlier. It’s part of a long tradition in Western financial journalism that looks at Indian wealth with a potent mix of discomfort, disapproval, and condescension. This time, though, the criticism is not just ill-founded — it’s tone-deaf to the massive opportunity this generation represents. Let’s take this piece apart. One Family ≠ All of India’s Business Dynasties Mukherjee builds his entire thesis on the Piramals winding down their legacy luggage business. But the Piramals are not a one-business family — and that luggage brand was far from the family’s economic center of gravity. In fact, they've pivoted toward high-value sectors like pharmaceuticals and financial services. To generalise this as a “pattern” of disinterest across India’s business scions is absurd. Most Legacy Next-Gen Heirs Aren’t Losing Inte...
Read more

Wipro’s Great Squander — From India’s First Computer-Maker to a Service-Provider at Risk of Irrelevance

The recent Infosys share buyback has reignited debates around Indian IT’s long-term strategy. While buybacks boost valuations temporarily, critics have rightly contrasted Indian IT majors with their Western counterparts. Companies like Oracle, Microsoft, or Salesforce use financial engineering alongside innovation, whereas Indian IT often leans on financial maneuvers in place of sustained innovation. BusinessLine, among others, has highlighted this growing gap — and the criticism was overdue. But to understand what’s at stake, we need to go back to the history of one of India’s IT bellwethers — Wipro. Unlike Infosys, Wipro was not always a services-only company. It has a product-building DNA that it has all but abandoned. Wipro’s Legacy of Product-Building Wipro was an Indian pioneer in personal computing. In the 1980s, it made one of India’s earliest PCs, well before mass-market computing became common. In the 2000s and 2010s, Wipro used to make desktop and laptop PCs. Beyond IT serv...
Read more

AI Context-Adding: The Next Leap in Social Media Credibility

Social media has given us unprecedented access to news and ideas — but also unprecedented exposure to mis- and disinformation. While platforms have tried various solutions, few have achieved the right balance between speed, credibility, inclusivity, and neutrality. One of the more promising ideas in recent years is X’s Community Notes — a crowdsourced way to add user-generated context to posts. But as it stands, the system is still largely unmoderated, inconsistent, and prone to both bias and misuse. I believe the idea can be greatly enhanced by blending democratic user participation with the speed and scale of AI. Not to fact-check in an aggressive, “true/false” sense, but to add benign, nuanced context that enriches understanding and reduces online polarization. The Model I Propose  1. Open Participation – The system should be open to all users, or at least low-barrier paying users. 2. Evidence-Based Flagging – Users can flag a post they believe lacks context or misrepresents eve...
Read more