Mishik Sharma

India’s semiconductor push has, understandably, been framed around fabs, frontier nodes, and technological sovereignty. The ambition is valid. But there is a quieter constraint that cannot be ignored: time. Semiconductor ecosystems take decades to mature, while India faces a far more immediate challenge—a large and restless youth cohort that must be absorbed into productive, dignified work. Bridging this mismatch requires a shift in emphasis, not a dilution of ambition. India should remain committed to a full-stack semiconductor ecosystem. But in the near term, it needs a layer that can scale faster, distribute geographically, and generate employment without waiting for long-gestation breakthroughs. That layer is semiconductor packaging . The Constraint: Long Horizons, Immediate Pressures Building cutting-edge fabs, materials ecosystems, and advanced design capabilities is a generational project. It requires capital, coordination, and institutional depth that cannot be rushed. Yet Indi...

India’s industrial transformation narrative is evolving rapidly. The language of Industry 4.0/5.0 now dominates policy discourses and public discussions. The next phase of industrialization is to be driven by green energy, AI, automation, and digitally coordinated production and logistics systems. Factories and fieldsites are expected not only to be powered by green energy, but also to operate as intelligent, adaptive systems. This vision is directionally sound—but structurally incomplete. The current discourse makes two conceptual leaps. The first, as I argued in a blogpost on 11 April, moves from renewable energy generation to industrial consumption, often overlooking the electrical infrastructure required to make power usable at scale. The second leap moves from powered systems to intelligent systems—without adequately accounting for the infrastructure that enables real-time control and responsiveness. If electrical infrastructure forms the first missing layer in this transition, e...

On 13 April, a short political news report in the New Indian Express drew citizens' attention to an under-examined concern: the expanding role of consultancy firms in government. The news capsule said that consultancy firms now draft policy papers, design tenders, manage bids, and sometimes oversee implementation. In several cases, they act like end-to-end operators while the official machinery only signs approvals and clears payments worth thousands of crores. The Cabinet Secretariat is reportedly now reviewing this dependence. The concern is valid—but incomplete. The real issue is not that consultants are present in governance. Modern states, especially those operating at India’s scale and complexity, will inevitably draw upon external expertise. The deeper issue is that consultants are being used in ways that reflect underlying structural gaps within the administrative system. In that sense, consultant dependence is not the disease. It is the symptom. The Misdiagnosis: “Too Much...

Over the past decade, India has become significantly better at building industrial capability. Production-linked incentives, logistics corridors, cluster-based development, and targeted skilling programmes have begun to produce credible manufacturing and technology ecosystems. In sectors ranging from electronics to renewable energy, the state has shown that it can assemble land, infrastructure, policy support, and demand visibility into functioning industrial nodes. But a structural gap remains. These successes tend to stay localised. They do not reliably replicate across geographies. India does not lack industrial policy. It lacks a scale-out system. Early Signals of Scale—But Not Yet Systemic There are early signals that India is beginning to move beyond isolated capability creation into scaling. India's smartphone manufacturing ecosystem has vastly expanded over the last few years. More recently, the broader electronics manufacturing ecosystem has also expanded. In parallel, gre...

Indian cities are expanding, yet daily life for most residents feels increasingly strained. Congested streets, strained public services, and financially weak local governments have become the norm rather than the exception. The recent launch of the Urban Challenge Fund (UCF), on 15 April, by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs offers a fresh approach — ₹1 lakh crore in central assistance to catalyse ₹4 lakh crore in total investment, with a clear push towards market-linked financing, redevelopment, and strengthening Urban Local Bodies (ULBs). Central share is capped at 25%, and the scheme emphasises bankable projects, municipal bonds, PPPs, and credit guarantees for smaller cities. This is a welcome shift from pure grant dependence. However, history shows that even well-designed central schemes often remain paper exercises if ULBs lack genuine interest and ownership — especially in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. Without building real capacity and fiscal strength at the local level, th...

India’s solar revolution has been impressive, with schemes like PM Surya Ghar and PM KUSUM driving rooftop installations and farmer-focused solar pumps. Yet, as I argued in an earlier blogpost in January, this push remains incomplete without reliable storage. Generation without storage leaves homes, farms, factories, and hospitals dependent on the grid or diesel during non-sunny hours, risking stranded capacity and undermining true energy independence. The government’s recent India Battery Vision 2047 and plans for an Approved List of Battery Manufacturers (ALBM) (originally reported by Livemint on 14 April, and recycled by other media) mark a significant step forward. This initiative targets rolling out about 47 GW of battery storage capacity in the near term, requiring investments of around $38 billion, while aiming for nearly 3 TWh of cumulative battery storage by 2047 across mobility, power, and electronics. The ALBM creates a “battery moat” by restricting government-backed project...