Beyond Models: Why AI Companies Should Expand Horizontally

In just a few years, global AI companies have achieved something extraordinary. From large language models to multi-modal reasoning systems, they now operate with global reach and distributed presence. Much of this comes from their reliance on globally distributed cloud networks like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure, giving them both the reach and the space to operate at planetary scale.

So far, these companies have expanded vertically — rolling out tiered models, premium versions, enterprise editions, and specialized APIs. This “model ladder” strategy resembles what we’ve seen in hardware or automobile industries: keep moving upward in sophistication and price. Yet, that ladder only reaches higher, not wider.

It’s time, therefore, for the next logical phase: horizontal expansion.


The Untapped Power of Horizontal Intelligence

If vertical expansion builds better models, horizontal expansion builds ecosystems. An AI company that already commands hundreds of millions of users and a global compute backbone is perfectly placed to branch into adjacent, everyday services — ones that extend AI’s presence across life domains rather than product tiers.

Imagine if a company like OpenAI created:

an email platform that drafts, prioritizes, and organizes messages based on context rather than chronology;

a photo library that groups images by emotional memory or thematic similarity;

an e-book and e-journal reader that can summarize, annotate, and cross-reference;

a local counsellor aggregator that bridges digital understanding and human help;

a blogging platform where writing and ideation merge seamlessly;

even an AI-assisted shopping or recommendation interface that interprets taste, not just transaction.


All of these are logical extensions of what these models already do: understand, organise, and personalise meaning.


The Browser: AI’s True Gateway to the World

Among all potential horizontals, the most transformative could be the AI browser.

A browser today merely displays — it fetches, renders, and lets us click. An AI browser, however, could represent the user on the web. It could log in, summarize pages, compare services, renew subscriptions, or make bookings on behalf of its human user — securely, contextually, and transparently.

This shifts the browser’s role from window to agent. It becomes a person's digital representative, capable of negotiating the internet as an extension of human intention.

However, such empowerment would also open new ethical and legal frontiers. If an AI browser acts independently, who will be responsible for its decisions? How should websites verify consent — from the person or their AI representative? These are early questions in what may soon evolve into a new legal category: AI representation rights.


So, Is Horizontal Expansion Feasible?

For earlier generations of technology companies, horizontal expansion demanded entirely new engineering teams, data architectures, and marketing ecosystems. But for AI companies, it’s different. The very intelligence that powers their core products can now generate and govern their expansions.

According to ChatGPT, a large model like GPT-5 can:

Auto-generate the scaffolding code for new applications.

Design the interaction logic for varied user interfaces.

Propose and refine data governance frameworks aligned with privacy norms.


In other words, these advanced models can help build their own horizontals. Therefore, instead of employing hundreds of software product specialists, an AI company would require only a compact supervisory team of senior specialists — guiding and integrating multiple AI-created applications into a coherent ecosystem.

This makes horizontal expansion low-cost, high-synergy, and low-friction — something no previous generation of tech companies could achieve. A few dozen human overseers could supervise what older firms would have needed thousands of engineers for.

This is the new industrial logic: AI-led production of AI ecosystems.


Brand Upgrading 

Therefore, this possibility, when it materialises, may require upgrading of current AI chatbot brands — for, they would then be far more than chat companions. As AI systems begin to browse, transact, schedule, and represent, their identity can no longer be confined to conversation. ChatGPT, for instance, might need to evolve into a broader, more inclusive brand — one that reflects its breadth of services and semantic presence. “Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer” (ChatGPT) may need to upgrade to “Comprehensive Generative Pretrained Transformer” (CGPT) — signalling the shift from conversational model to comprehensive cognitive infrastructure.


From Utility to Habitat

Sociologically, this shift would be profound: While vertical AI serves needs; horizontal AI inhabits lives.

A person may use a chat model occasionally, but they live through a browser, mail, photos, books, and commerce. When AI enters these layers, it becomes not a mere utility but a cognitive habitat — something integrated into daily rhythms, not summoned on demand.

In that sense, horizontal expansion isn’t just a growth strategy; it’s social embedding — a way for AI firms to move from being market products to cultural infrastructures.


From Ecosystem Scale to Semantic Cohesion

Every smartphone’s ecosystem today is app-centric. But a horizontally expanded AI ecosystem would be semantic-centric.

All services — browser, mail, books, photos, counselling, commerce — could share one intelligence core, one user identity, and one conversation history.

This would mark the arrival of semantic intelligence: the intelligence that studies, interprets, and navigates a person's digital world.


The Broader Analogy: Tesla, but for Thought

I showed in my previous blogpost how Tesla, if it expands horizontally into energy and industrial components, would secure its economic longevity. I'm applying the same logic here: AI firms’ horizontal expansion will also secure their economic longevity. Both would transcend their initial verticals to build sustainability through horizontal integration.

A future "CGPT Browser" or "CGPT Mail" wouldn’t be a separate business unit — it would be a node in a continuous semantic fabric. A living ecosystem where AI doesn’t just answer queries, but conducts life.


Conclusion: The Age of the CGPT Ecosystem

We'll soon be entering the post-platform era: an era where AI users don’t go to websites — their AI agent does, on their behalf.

That is the true promise of horizontal AI:
Not just thinking for us, but acting for us. 
Not just assisting us, but representing us.

And if “ChatGPT” does become “CGPT”, it would no longer be just an assistant, but an intelligence agent for human agency.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Bored" or Rewriting the Playbook? A Rebuttal to the West’s Sneering Gaze at India’s Legacy Billionaire Gen Z

Bloomberg's Andy Mukherjee’s latest opinion piece — sniggering at India’s legacy billionaire Gen Z for supposedly being “bored” of their family businesses — is hardly an outlier. It’s part of a long tradition in Western financial journalism that looks at Indian wealth with a potent mix of discomfort, disapproval, and condescension. This time, though, the criticism is not just ill-founded — it’s tone-deaf to the massive opportunity this generation represents. Let’s take this piece apart. One Family ≠ All of India’s Business Dynasties Mukherjee builds his entire thesis on the Piramals winding down their legacy luggage business. But the Piramals are not a one-business family — and that luggage brand was far from the family’s economic center of gravity. In fact, they've pivoted toward high-value sectors like pharmaceuticals and financial services. To generalise this as a “pattern” of disinterest across India’s business scions is absurd. Most Legacy Next-Gen Heirs Aren’t Losing Inte...
Read more

Wipro’s Great Squander — From India’s First Computer-Maker to a Service-Provider at Risk of Irrelevance

The recent Infosys share buyback has reignited debates around Indian IT’s long-term strategy. While buybacks boost valuations temporarily, critics have rightly contrasted Indian IT majors with their Western counterparts. Companies like Oracle, Microsoft, or Salesforce use financial engineering alongside innovation, whereas Indian IT often leans on financial maneuvers in place of sustained innovation. BusinessLine, among others, has highlighted this growing gap — and the criticism was overdue. But to understand what’s at stake, we need to go back to the history of one of India’s IT bellwethers — Wipro. Unlike Infosys, Wipro was not always a services-only company. It has a product-building DNA that it has all but abandoned. Wipro’s Legacy of Product-Building Wipro was an Indian pioneer in personal computing. In the 1980s, it made one of India’s earliest PCs, well before mass-market computing became common. In the 2000s and 2010s, Wipro used to make desktop and laptop PCs. Beyond IT serv...
Read more

AI Context-Adding: The Next Leap in Social Media Credibility

Social media has given us unprecedented access to news and ideas — but also unprecedented exposure to mis- and disinformation. While platforms have tried various solutions, few have achieved the right balance between speed, credibility, inclusivity, and neutrality. One of the more promising ideas in recent years is X’s Community Notes — a crowdsourced way to add user-generated context to posts. But as it stands, the system is still largely unmoderated, inconsistent, and prone to both bias and misuse. I believe the idea can be greatly enhanced by blending democratic user participation with the speed and scale of AI. Not to fact-check in an aggressive, “true/false” sense, but to add benign, nuanced context that enriches understanding and reduces online polarization. The Model I Propose  1. Open Participation – The system should be open to all users, or at least low-barrier paying users. 2. Evidence-Based Flagging – Users can flag a post they believe lacks context or misrepresents eve...
Read more