Beyond Sanyal's Sensationism: Why Institutional Continuity Matters in India’s Industrial Growth
In recent months, a rehashed view has been gaining currency in Indian economic discourse—most prominently articulated by popular economist Sanjeev Sanyal—that a healthy economy requires continuous corporate churn. According to this argument, each generation of large firms should be replaced by a new generation; today’s largest companies should not remain so a decade later. In the Indian context, legacy conglomerates are portrayed as self-preserving, inward-looking, and insufficiently innovative, while new firms are cast as the rightful agents of dynamism. At first glance, this thesis is academically elegant. On closer inspection, it is economically misleading and strategically obstructive. The Wrong Question: Startup vs Legacy The most fundamental flaw in the “continuous churn” narrative is that it asks the wrong question. From a policy perspective, it should not matter whether a firm originates as a startup, a family conglomerate, a public-sector enterprise, or a cooperative. What mat...